Next build ignore typescript errors

Disabling TypeScript Build Checks in Next.js: The Nuclear Option

TypeScript is one of Next.js's best features for maintaining code quality, but sometimes you need to bypass type-checking during builds (we all get lazy sometimes). While this approach should be used with extreme caution, here's how to do it.

/** @type {import('next').NextConfig} */ const nextConfig = { typescript: { ignoreBuildErrors: true, }, }; export default nextConfig;

Add this configuration to your to disable TypeScript build-time checks.

However, proceed with caution. Disabling type checking removes a crucial safety net that helps prevent runtime errors. Consider using more targeted solutions like:

Adding comments for specific lines
Properly typing your code
Using type judiciously for problematic sections (but at that stage who are we fooling).

Remember to re-enable type checking once you've resolved the underlying issues to maintain code quality and catch potential bugs early.

How to ignore typescript errors on appflow build?

Thank for comments for both. The problem still remains though. When running the build at localhost, there is no errors, even though it is running the same build script mentioned in the package.json as netkow pointed out. So it happens only at Appflow.
In tsconfig.json I already had “noEmit”: true but as mentioned at the linked I also added “noEmitOnError”: true. Same results. Also tried with both as false as also that post suggests. Still same results, ok at locahost, but not ok at AppFlow.

As for the matter of ignoring the TypeScript erros, I disagree a bit. I too think it is important to clean them, but doing so at every step, before every minor change / build / test slows down production quite much. For example, when you just need to show the current status to UI designer to ask their opinion, it is not vital that every unused variable has been cleaned, it should be enough if there is no errors preventing the application or at least he page in question to run. However, when reaching certain milestone during development, like after creating the new feature, or when looking forward to publish it even just to interest part

Vercel build fails after passing linting checks, but it works locally

Hello all,

We’ve been active on upgrading our monorepo venture, which uses Turborepo, Next.js, and React, to the latest versions. We’ve followed each upgrade manual carefully and migrated everything accordingly.

Both next build and development (next dev) are working perfectly when run locally in each of our monorepos. However, the issue arises when we try to build the project on Vercel.

Here’s what we’ve tried so far to resolve the issue:

Moved react, react-dom, and their respective types from the child files to the root .
Added to the environment variables.
Fixed types and resolved any potential issues that could break the build (as mentioned, the build works fine locally).
Cleared the , , and over 20 times, followed by fresh installations.
Investigated potential issues related to Prisma, as it was one of our initial suspects.
Tried numerous other fixes.

Despite all these attempts, nothing has resolved the issue. We keep encountering the matching error on Vercel without any detailed logs, even after trying to enable more verbose logging.

It’s worth noting that the other repositories in our mono

Typescript - How to compile even if errors

Is not a big problem, I will just fix the code in this case.

But I would like the option to turn it off, one of the fundamental principals of Typescript is incremental adoption. A warning at compilation should be an option, because I rather have a warning of something that I made wrong than just changing from to and never see the error again.

For example: the documentaion on how to deploy it to Heroku has a problem with , it does not compile:

Is a copy and paste from the documentation, and I don’t feel like diving into it right now, so I just switched to and the error is gone for ever. I would have like to leave the warning on.

Sometimes you will deal with external factors that you can’t control (like third party dependencies), and not being able to build your app because some parameter can be even thought you know that is totally fine seems like a radical approach.

And now consider that I have an already existing app that has 3 years and that I have to migrate, here is when incremental adoption becomes a deal breaker.

Sorry to sound a bit pissed off, I have been changing gradually all the to because if not the app doesn’t wo

Deploy Failed With Vercel

Thanks for the thorough reply. Ultimately I was able get this going with the buildercontent removal and them some other minor fixes to page model references. I tried the linting route, but as you noted the differences between local and Vercel were causing issues. local came back clean but Vercel was failing.

I guess ultimately I’m most interested in the differences between Vercel and local, as you noted. I will review the Vercel ci/cd settings as my local setup is pretty standard and I’d be surprised if any changes were required that are specific to a nextjs/builder config.

The docs regarding if builderContent is required or not, or why it wouldn’t be, might be a bit light? Maybe I was looking in the wrong place, but I was confused as to why it could be removed (linting aside) as I thought it was needed for the builder UI data to get API’d to the app. Clearly I’m confused with some of the underlying mechanics!

Thanks for the help.